When Saudi Arabia goes out of its phase
[ad_1]
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has always had a special place in the hearts of Muslims, as it is the one who has the honor to protect the Two Holy Mosques, and it supervises the care of the fifth pillar of Islam, and it had a significant role in international relations, given its storage of the largest oil reserves, its financial strength, and its balance in relations Public and their leading roles. Its policy was a factor of calming down, and it was seen in the Gulf states as the big brother, and it did not skimp on being in other parts of the Arab and Islamic world an agent of calming, reconciliation and support. It is natural for all eyes to turn to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, to watch its development and monitor what is taking place in it, given this position and this role. However, the current policy of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is far from the founding rules in its immediate vicinity in the Arabian Peninsula first, as it launched war on Yemen, imposed the blockade on Qatar, distanced itself from the Palestinian cause, and sought to fill one side against another in the Arab conflicts, in contrast to its previous policy, which sought to bridge the rift and bridge the gap. And what it is inclined to do today is its prejudice against the spectrum of societies in the Arab world and the living forces in it. The rulers of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia have the right to make the changes imposed by global changes and the development of their society, or what they see in the interest of their country, but without denying the foundations of their country or the rules governing its policy. The most important thing is that they do not deny the morals of chivalry and chastity associated with the reference of Islam that they adopt. It is the duty of the rulers of Saudi Arabia, as well as those with opinions about it, to realize that the disagreement about its policy and its choices is not prejudicial to Saudi Arabia, a system, a state and a people. It does not seem to be the prevailing view today of those who manage affairs in the Kingdom, or their mouthpieces in the media. I say this on the occasion of the prejudice of a Saudi journalist in a video tape against Morocco, the dignity of its sons and daughters, and his advice on what should and should not be, and he called him the most virulent descriptions of Moroccans. After Morocco was nominated for the World Cup, a young man came up with insults to Morocco, defending Morocco’s inability to organize an international meeting the size of the World Cup, and calling the Moroccans to the Berbers, and therefore they are far from using Arab ties, not to mention other expressions of contempt. What we consider belonging to the "Berbers" in the circle of Islam is a blasphemy, and it is a religion that did not distinguish between an Arab and a non-Arab except by piety. And Islam, until further notice, is the reference point for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. And a sheikh who was of his age set out to turn him back to the intention in saying, and slow down in ruling, on the occasion of demonstrations in Rabat denouncing the deal of the century, we called Moroccans unworthy of his transmission, at least he called them hypocrisy. He should have been aware that the activities of Moroccan society are one thing, and official policy is another, and objectivity also required a reminder of what the Moroccan government had done in denouncing dishonorable behaviors that affected state symbols. This does not prevent the journalist from expressing his opinion about what he sees as a contradiction or hypocrisy, but without reducing it to cheap insults and detestable abuse. And in the month of Ramadan, a journalist appeared again, who would not have deserved the attention, were it not that he exposed the honor of Moroccan women and the dignity of Moroccans, and foolish the country's economic policy. Did the associate say this to the press on his own? Or is it a horn to transport what was loaded? Foolish if not commanded. For those who give advice, we respond gently, is it good for the economy to detain some of the richest people in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and to require them to give up a portion of their wealth? Is there any payment of opinion forcing a prime minister to resign in a country other than his own country, except for the leakage of ill-treatment? Is it chivalry to push on a weak neighbor, bomb its civilians and push its citizens to starvation and deadly diseases, as reported by the international press far from the conflict? Is it ethical to impose the blockade on a member state of the Gulf Cooperation Council, was it the supposed framework for resolving the conflict? Not to mention Jamal Khashoggi's precedent, which is broken by heart, and those who are detained are opinion-holders, and those who died behind bars. If she had a bracelet she blew me, for how does what dictate what should and should not be? The disgrace that we Moroccans have come to us, from some Saudi trumpets, would have really hurt us, if what we were reviled with had been issued by those who had wisdom, prudent orientations, and insightful visions. The insult that the Saudi journalist uttered offends Saudi Arabia first. How can it be a protector of the Two Holy Places and not protect the morals associated with them? Is not the sanctity of a Muslim with God greater than the sanctity of the Sacred House, as in the noble hadith? Unless the protection of the Two Holy Mosques is something that is negligent, which is what Moroccans, government and people did not dispute. How can she abuse him by launching reckless campaigns against Muslims and mistreating them. The rulers of Saudi Arabia have the right to make the choices they want, and to set the priorities in the North African region as they like. It is their right to receive whomever they want, whenever they want, and to bend what they want to those who want to be the tongue of their condition, but it is their duty to respect the sanctity of peoples if they are blinded to realize the logic of the state. It is the duty of Moroccan diplomacy in its dealings with Saudi Arabia to remain in the circle of principles. The Saudi state is what matters and is not the whims of people, regardless of their ranks. The Saudi people exist, and it requires us Moroccans to have a duty of reverence and respect. The Moroccan diplomacy did well by condemning the attack on Saudi Arabia at Aramco facilities. The activities of the Moroccan people are not justified for slipping into reactions to a statement that the free Saudis condemn before others. The best of what is to be cited in this blessed month is what is mentioned in the Holy Qur’an “Those who suppress anger and forgive people”.
Well I want
[ad_2]
Ahosti